📊 Recent Form
🧭 How the Model Sees It
The engine puts Belgium at 55%, ahead but not commandingly. With the draw at 22% this is a fixture the model expects to stay tight.
We have Belgium at 55% where the consensus of 14 bookmakers has 67% — a gap against us of 12 points. Disagreements like this are where a model earns or loses its reputation, so it is stated plainly rather than sold as an edge.
The projection totals 3 goals. That clears the 2.5 line, and it is roughly what an average football match produces — the model is not expecting anything unusual in either direction.
Confidence is filed as medium at 63/99. That tier is set from the shape of the probability distribution, not from how the fixture feels, and it is published before kick-off and graded against the result afterwards — right or wrong, it stays on the page.
📝 Match Recap
Belgium and Iran played out a goalless draw in a World Cup group-stage clash that defied pre-match expectations for an open, attacking contest. The match remained scoreless throughout, though Belgium's task grew substantially harder when N. Ngoy was sent off in the 66th minute, reducing the designated home side to ten men for the final stretch. Neither team managed to break the deadlock despite the high stakes of group-stage football, where both sides arrived with clear motivation to secure a positive result.
Our model predicted a 2-1 Belgium victory before kickoff, assigning a 55% win probability to Belgium and just 22% to a draw. The goalless outcome fell well outside the model's primary lean, which had weighted a more attacking, open match. That forecast rested on Belgium's full squad fitness and recent momentum against Iran's strong recent form, which included goals in four of their last five outings. The red card to Ngoy at the hour mark altered the tactical shape considerably, but the prediction's emphasis on attacking potential did not align with how the match actually unfolded. This represents a clear miss for the model, which had not anticipated such a cautious, low-scoring outcome despite the tournament pressure and group-stage urgency facing both sides.
💰 Finding the Value
Our model probability vs the consensus across 14 bookmakers. Positive edge means we think this outcome is more likely than the market implies.
| Selection | Odds | Market % | Model % | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belgium Win | 2/5 1.42 | 67% | 55% | -12% |
| Draw | 7/2 4.60 | 21% | 22% | +1% |
| Iran Win Value | 7/1 8.00 | 12% | 23% | +11% |
View pre-match analysis What we said before kickoff
⚡ Stakes & Context
- 🆕 Fresh standings — no meaningful positions established yet, both sides starting on equal footing
🔍 Key Stats
Form: Belgium are well-rested with full squad; Iran arrive on a strong run with 2+ goals in four of last five games.
H2H: Limited historical data between these sides at World Cup level.
Stakes: World Cup group stage — both teams highly motivated, Belgium needing a win to assert group dominance, Iran seeking an upset to advance.
Betting: both teams to score, over 2.5 goals — in line with the projected 2-1.
⚔️ Head to Head
Limited data — minimal World Cup head-to-head history between Belgium and Iran to draw strong conclusions from.
🎲 Betting Tips
Both Teams to Score: Yes
The projected 2-1 scoreline has both teams finding the net.
Over 2.5 Goals: Yes
The projected 2-1 scoreline totals 3 goals, clearing the 2.5 line.
📊 Group G Standings
| Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgium | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | Egypt | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 3 | Iran | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 4 | New Zealand | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
Live Group G table, built from completed results · full group page →