📊 Recent Form
NEC Nijmegen
Bodo/Glimt
🧭 How the Model Sees It
The engine puts Bodo/Glimt at 45%, ahead but not commandingly. With the draw at 21% this is a fixture the model expects to stay tight.
We have Bodo/Glimt at 45% where the consensus of 14 bookmakers has 39% — a gap in our favour of 6 points. Disagreements like this are where a model earns or loses its reputation, so it is stated plainly rather than sold as an edge.
The projection totals 4 goals. Comfortably over 2.5 and above the average match — the model expects both defences to give something up.
Confidence is filed as medium at 52/99. That tier is set from the shape of the probability distribution, not from how the fixture feels, and it is published before kick-off and graded against the result afterwards — right or wrong, it stays on the page.
📝 Match Recap
Bodo/Glimt dispatched NEC Nijmegen with a dominant performance in this Champions League knockout tie, winning 3-1 to advance. The Norwegian side struck early through Fet in the 25th minute with an assist from Hauge, then doubled their advantage from the penalty spot when Helmersen converted in the 44th. By the time Aleesami added a third just after the interval—courtesy of a Berg assist—the tie was essentially over. Nijmegen pulled one back through Bischoff late on, assisted by Tadic, but it came too late to mount any meaningful comeback.
Our model had called this 1-3 scoreline before kickoff, predicting it as the most likely outcome at 45% probability for a Bodo/Glimt win. That's a lean rather than a certainty, but the match unfolded broadly as the underlying form suggested it might. Bodo/Glimt came in on strong recent shape with consistent attacking threat, while Nijmegen's home record looked patchy and their scoring output modest by comparison. The Norwegian side's superior depth and rest advantage—crucial in a knockout format—showed through in their control of the game and clinical finishing when chances arrived.
The penalty changed the flow momentarily but Bodo/Glimt never looked rattled, and Aleesami's third-quarter goal killed the contest. Nijmegen's late consolation doesn't alter the narrative: the better side won, the scoreline matched our expectation, and the model's assessment of the gap between these two proved accurate.
💰 Finding the Value
Our model probability vs the consensus across 14 bookmakers. Positive edge means we think this outcome is more likely than the market implies.
| Selection | Odds | Market % | Model % | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEC Nijmegen Win | 13/8 2.61 | 36% | 34% | -2% |
| Draw | 11/4 3.70 | 25% | 21% | -4% |
| Bodo/Glimt Win Value | 6/4 2.44 | 39% | 45% | +6% |
View pre-match analysis What we said before kickoff
⚡ Stakes & Context
- 🏆 UEFA Champions League knockout — elimination stakes
🔍 Key Stats
Form: Bodo/Glimt on a 10-game streak dominated by wins, scoring 2.86 avg; NEC inconsistent at home (WLLLWWL) scoring 1.75 avg
H2H: Limited data between these sides
Stakes: UEFA Champions League knockout — both sides fully motivated, but Bodo/Glimt's superior rest, form and depth give them a decisive edge
Betting: both teams to score, over 2.5 goals — in line with the projected 1-3.
⚔️ Head to Head
Limited data — these clubs have minimal European meeting history, so form and model outputs carry the primary weight here.
🎲 Betting Tips
Both Teams to Score: Yes
The projected 1-3 scoreline has both teams finding the net.
Over 2.5 Goals: Yes
The projected 1-3 scoreline totals 4 goals, clearing the 2.5 line.